July 16 Editorial Analysis – PM IAS

1. More than Symbolic: On curbing unhealthy food intake

• Syllabus Relevance:
  • GS2: Health & Governance: Government policies and interventions for public health; issues relating to the development and management of social sector/services relating to Health.
  • GS3: Indian Economy (Food Industry) & Public Health: Health as a development indicator; challenges of non-communicable diseases (NCDs).
• Core Argument: The editorial praises the Health Ministry’s initiatives for promoting awareness about unhealthy food (e.g., displaying fat, sugar, trans-fat content; CBSE’s “sugar boards”). However, it critically argues that these are “more than symbolic” only if backed by stringent legislative and enforcement measures, highlighting the limitations of awareness campaigns alone.
• Key Points for UPSC:
  • Context: Rising rates of obesity and NCDs (diabetes, heart disease) in India, underscored by NFHS data (e.g., significant increases in overweight/obese populations across age groups).
  • “Visual Behavioural Nudges”: This concept, drawing on behavioural economics, suggests that subtle cues can influence choices. The editorial sees the current initiatives as examples but points out their inadequacy without stronger regulatory backing.
  • Policy Gaps/Critiques:
    • Front-of-Package Labelling (FOPL): The editorial implicitly criticizes the delay or dilution of a mandatory FOPL system for packaged unhealthy foods in India, which would provide clear, simple warnings (e.g., “red light” system). Several countries (e.g., Chile, Mexico, UK) have adopted stringent FOPL.
    • Advertising Regulations: Lack of effective curbs on aggressive advertising of unhealthy foods, especially those targeting children.
    • “Fat Taxes” (Sugar/Fat taxes): Absence of taxation on High Fat, Sugar, and Salt (HFSS) products, which could disincentivize consumption and generate revenue for public health initiatives.
    • FSSAI’s Role: While the Food Safety and Standards Authority of India (FSSAI) is the apex body, its 2020 amendment on nutritional labeling is deemed insufficient by the editorial if not paired with stricter enforcement and clear thresholds.
  • Way Forward/Recommendations: The piece advocates for a comprehensive approach combining awareness, strong regulatory frameworks (FOPL, ad bans), and fiscal measures (taxes) to genuinely curb unhealthy food intake and address the NCD crisis.
• UPSC Linkage: This editorial is directly relevant to questions on public health policy, the role of regulatory bodies (FSSAI), NCD burden, and the effectiveness of behavioural interventions versus legislative measures. It encourages thinking about a multi-pronged strategy for public health.

---

2. The Myth of “Smart” Cities: Gurugram’s Urban Crisis

• Syllabus Relevance:
  • GS1: Urbanization & Social Issues: Problems of urbanization; urban planning; role of caste and social structures in urban development.
  • GS2: Governance & Local Self-Government: Issues relating to planning and management of urban infrastructure; accountability mechanisms; challenges in implementation of urban schemes (like Smart Cities Mission).
• Core Argument: The editorial uses the recurring infrastructural failures in supposedly “smart” cities like Gurugram (e.g., severe flooding) to argue that urban crises stem from deeper governance, planning, and socio-cultural deficiencies, not just technical issues. It critiques the idea of “false modernity” built on exclusionary practices.
• Key Points for UPSC:
  • “Smart Cities Mission” Critique: The editorial implicitly questions the efficacy of the “Smart Cities” approach if it doesn’t address fundamental civic planning, accountability, and inclusive development. It highlights that technology (like CCTV, GIS) cannot compensate for a lack of genuine civic engagement and ethical governance.
  • Root Causes of Urban Dysfunction:
    • Planning Deficits: Inadequate drainage systems, unplanned growth, encroachment on natural water bodies (e.g., wetlands, floodplains), and insufficient urban infrastructure for rapid population growth.
    • Governance Failures: “Bureaucratic inertia,” lack of accountability of civic bodies, corruption in urban development projects, and poor enforcement of building codes and zoning laws.
    • Socio-Cultural Factors:
      • “False Modernity” & Gated Communities: The creation of insulated, private spaces (gated communities) that neglect public civic infrastructure and collective responsibility, leading to “fragmented urbanism.”
      • Rural Mindsets in Urban Settings: The editorial provocatively argues that traditional rural practices like caste-based segregation and the “misuse” of land consolidation tools (chakbandi and kilabandi) for private gain perpetuate inequality and undermine urban planning principles. This suggests a continuation of social divisions into urban spaces, hindering inclusive development.
  • “Urban Citizenship”: The editorial advocates for a shift from an individualistic approach to a collective sense of “urban citizenship,” where residents take responsibility for public spaces and demand accountability from civic authorities.
  • Way Forward: Calls for fundamental reforms in urban planning, strengthening local governance, ensuring transparency and accountability in land use and infrastructure projects, and fostering a robust public sphere that prioritizes collective welfare over private gain.
• UPSC Linkage: Relevant for questions on urban planning challenges, failures of smart city initiatives, issues of governance and accountability in ULBs, impact of social structures on urban development,