Nov 13 – UPSC Current Affairs – PM IAS

1. Dumpsite Remediation Accelerator Programme (DRAP)

Syllabus

GS-II: Government policies and interventions for development in various sectors.

GS-III: Conservation, environmental pollution and degradation. Urbanization challenges.

Context

The launch of the Dumpsite Remediation Accelerator Programme (DRAP) by the Ministry of Housing and Urban Affairs (MoHUA) during the National Urban Conclave is a mission-mode initiative to fast-track the remediation of existing dumpsites across urban India. The program is directly tied to the national goal of achieving “Lakshya Zero Dumpsites” by September 2026 under the Swachh Bharat Mission-Urban (SBM-U). This move is critical as India’s cities face escalating land pressure and environmental damage from legacy waste that has accumulated over decades in massive landfills.

Main Body in Multi-Dimensional Analysis

1. Environmental and Land Use Dimension

Legacy waste (often decades old) in dumpsites is a potent source of landfill gas (primarily methane, a powerful greenhouse gas), leachate (toxic liquid contaminating soil and groundwater), and air pollution from fires. DRAP aims to reclaim valuable urban land—often acres in prime city locations—by processing this waste using technologies like Biomining and Bio-remediation. This not only reduces India’s greenhouse gas emissions but also frees up real estate for community parks, housing, or infrastructure, directly benefiting urban environmental health and planning.

2. Financial and Governance Dimension

The Accelerator Programme structure is designed to overcome the common hurdles of funding and project execution. It promises additional financial support to cities that show commitment to remediation projects. A key governance innovation is the proposed involvement of corporate and Public Sector Undertakings (PSUs) for project support (CSR or financial), shifting the burden solely from Municipal Corporations. Furthermore, the plan to utilize the inert waste for road construction projects by Central and state road agencies (MoRTH, NHAI) provides a ready market for the end product, enhancing the financial viability of remediation.

3. Social and Health Dimension

Dumpsites are often located near marginalized communities, leading to severe health disparities (respiratory illnesses, skin conditions). Remediation directly improves the quality of life and health outcomes for these residents. The process also formalizes the work of waste pickers and ragpickers, integrating them into the organized waste processing value chain through specialized training and provision of safety gear. Thus, DRAP is simultaneously a public health intervention, a climate action plan, and an exercise in urban social justice.


Positives, Negatives, and Government Schemes

CategoryDescription
PositivesTargeted Deadline: Mission-mode approach with a clear ‘Zero Dumpsites by Sept 2026’ target. Resource Linkage: Creates market for inert waste by linking with MoRTH for road construction. Methane Reduction: Addresses climate change by remediating methane-emitting legacy landfills. Land Reclamation: Frees up valuable urban land for productive use.
NegativesTechnology Scale: Biomining and processing techniques can be capital-intensive and slow to scale across thousands of sites. Logistical Hurdles: Challenge of moving massive quantities of processed waste and securing approvals for its use in construction. State Capacity: Municipal capacity and technical expertise vary widely across cities, potentially leading to uneven implementation.
Government SchemesSwachh Bharat Mission – Urban 2.0: Comprehensive mission for solid waste management. City Investments to Innovate, Integrate and Sustain (CITIIS) 2.0: Supports integrated urban infrastructure and service delivery projects.

Way Forward

  1. Mandatory Technical Audit: Institute mandatory third-party technical audits of all ongoing and completed remediation projects to ensure quality and prevent sub-standard work.
  2. Financial Innovation: Establish a Dedicated Waste Remediation Fund leveraging green bonds and CSR funding specifically for DRAP.
  3. Capacity Building Hubs: Create regional Centers of Excellence (CoE) for waste management and biomining technology to train municipal staff and private contractors.
  4. Incentivizing States: Introduce a competitive ranking system (like the Swachh Survekshan) focused solely on dumpsite remediation progress, offering greater financial incentives for top-performing states.

Conclusion

The Dumpsite Remediation Accelerator Programme is a bold, time-bound commitment necessary to cleanse India’s urban landscape. By providing dedicated financial, technical, and governance support, DRAP moves beyond policy intent to concrete execution. Its success will not only be measured in acres of reclaimed land but also in India’s improved air quality, reduced climate footprint, and a tangible rise in the quality of urban life, making it a critical measure of urban governance in the next two years.


2. Rationalisation of Royalty Rates for Critical Minerals

Syllabus

GS-III: Indian Economy, mobilization of resources. Infrastructure: Energy. Science and Technology- developments and their applications and effects in everyday life.

Context

The Cabinet approval to rationalize the royalty rates for key critical minerals, including Graphite, Caesium, Rubidium, and Zirconium, is a significant policy decision from the Ministry of Mines. These minerals are vital inputs for India’s push towards Green Energy transition (e.g., batteries, nuclear energy), hi-tech electronics, and specialized industrial applications. The move, mandated under the Mines and Minerals (Development and Regulation) Act, 1957 (MMDR Act), is aimed at incentivizing domestic mining and processing of these strategic resources, reducing import dependency, and fostering a robust indigenous supply chain for the nation’s ambitious Net-Zero goals.

Main Body in Multi-Dimensional Analysis

1. Economic and Industrial Dimension

Royalty rates directly impact the cost of production for miners. By rationalizing these rates—for example, setting differential rates for Graphite based on carbon content (2% for high-grade, 4% for lower-grade)—the government makes specific mining activities more economically viable. The lower rates for Caesium, Rubidium, and Zirconium (e.g., 2% and 1% respectively) are designed to attract private investment in exploration and mining of these previously neglected ‘niche’ minerals. This fiscal incentive is expected to kickstart domestic production, leading to value addition and creating employment in the primary and secondary processing sectors.

2. Energy Security and Geopolitical Dimension

Critical minerals are the ‘new oil’ for the digital and green economy. India’s current reliance on imports for most of these minerals creates supply chain vulnerability and geopolitical risk. Graphite is essential for Lithium-ion battery anodes (EVs and storage), while Zirconium is crucial for nuclear reactors (fuel cladding) and advanced ceramics. Caesium and Rubidium are used in atomic clocks and space technology. This rationalization is a step towards achieving ‘Mineral Security’ by accelerating the establishment of a domestic reserve base and processing ecosystem, which is vital for long-term strategic autonomy in the energy and defense sectors.

3. Environmental and Sustainable Mining Dimension

The MMDR Act mandates the Central Government to consider environmental sustainability while fixing royalty rates. The rationalization must be viewed in conjunction with stringent environmental clearances. While promoting mining, the policy must ensure that mining practices, especially for minerals like graphite, minimize their ecological footprint and adhere to international best practices in waste management. The financial viability provided by rationalized royalties should be partially channelled into restoration funds to ensure mined areas are rehabilitated post-extraction, fulfilling the environmental governance mandate.


Positives, Negatives, and Government Schemes

CategoryDescription
PositivesInvestment Incentive: Lower and differential royalty rates attract domestic and foreign investment in exploration and mining. De-risking Supply Chain: Builds indigenous capacity for strategic minerals, crucial for EVs and nuclear power. Value Addition: Differentiated rates (e.g., for Graphite) incentivize processing to achieve higher grades. Economic Boost: Creates jobs and stimulates regional industrial development in mining areas.
NegativesEnvironmental Impact: Accelerated mining, if not strictly regulated, could lead to local environmental damage and displacement of communities. Global Price Volatility: Royalty fixation needs flexibility to respond to highly volatile global mineral prices and demand. Exploration Gap: Rationalized rates alone may not be enough; targeted investment in deep exploration and geological surveying is still required.
Government SchemesNational Green Hydrogen Mission: Relies on batteries and electrolyzers that use critical minerals. Production Linked Incentive (PLI) Schemes: Schemes for ACC batteries and automobiles drive demand for Graphite. Mines and Minerals (Development and Regulation) Act, 1957: Legal framework for the current action.

Way Forward

  1. Creation of a Critical Mineral Fund: Establish a dedicated, revolving fund to support high-risk, deep-sea, and deep-earth exploration projects for these minerals, supplementing private sector efforts.
  2. Integrated Licensing Process: Streamline the cumbersome process of obtaining various clearances (environmental, forest, mining) into a single-window system to accelerate project implementation timelines.
  3. Technological Leap: Incentivize the use of advanced, environmentally sustainable mining and mineral processing technologies (e.g., dry processing) to minimize water and energy consumption.
  4. Global Collaboration: Secure international partnerships (e.g., with Australia, Canada) for joint exploration and technology transfer to quickly build necessary domain expertise.

Conclusion

The rationalization of royalty rates for critical minerals is a progressive fiscal measure signaling the government’s seriousness about achieving resource self-reliance in the era of Green Transition. By making domestic extraction more commercially appealing, the policy provides a strong foundational incentive. However, the true benefit will be unlocked only when this fiscal push is integrated with faster clearances, advanced technology adoption, and robust environmental safeguards, ensuring India’s mineral security without compromising ecological balance.


3. Directorate General of GST Intelligence (DGGI) Uncovers ₹645 Crore ITC Racket

Syllabus

GS-III: Indian Economy and issues relating to mobilization of resources, growth, development. Government Budgeting.

Context

The Directorate General of GST Intelligence (DGGI), Delhi Zonal Unit, uncovered a racket for fraudulently availing Input Tax Credit (ITC) amounting to ₹645 crore, leading to the arrest of the key operator. This PIB-reported event underscores the persistent challenge of GST fraud, where sophisticated networks exploit loopholes to generate bogus invoices and claim undue tax refunds. Such rackets erode the tax base, distort market competition, and pose a major obstacle to the successful implementation of the Goods and Services Tax (GST) regime, impacting both central and state revenues.

Main Body in Multi-Dimensional Analysis

1. Tax Compliance and Fiscal Dimension

The fraudulent claim of Input Tax Credit (ITC)—the tax a business pays on inputs and can adjust against its final output tax liability—is the most common form of GST fraud. By using fake invoices, operators artificially inflate their purchases, claim high ITC, and evade the payment of GST. The ₹645 crore racket represents a significant loss to the public exchequer, undermining the fiscal health of the government and reducing the funds available for public infrastructure and social welfare schemes. Consistent crackdown operations like this are vital for ensuring the purity of the tax chain and reinforcing taxpayer compliance.

2. Technology and Data Analytics Dimension

GST Intelligence agencies, including DGGI, increasingly rely on advanced data analytics, Artificial Intelligence (AI), and cross-referencing platforms (like E-Way bills, Income Tax data, and GST returns) to identify fraudulent patterns. The success of this operation confirms the efficacy of these digital tools in detecting anomalies such as sudden spikes in ITC claims, circular trading, and mismatches between the GSTR-1 (sales) and GSTR-3B (summary return). Continuous investment in and refinement of these predictive analytics tools are essential to stay ahead of increasingly sophisticated white-collar criminals who exploit digital systems.

3. Market and Competition Dimension

Fake invoicing and fraudulent ITC claims create an unfair competitive environment. Businesses that evade GST can offer products and services at artificially lower prices than honest, compliant businesses, driving the latter out of the market. This not only discourages genuine businesses but also creates a shadow economy. By dismantling these rackets, the DGGI ensures a level playing field, promoting formalization, and rewarding legitimate enterprises that comply with the tax law. The action reinforces the government’s commitment to an ethical market economy.


Positives, Negatives, and Government Schemes

CategoryDescription
PositivesEnhanced Enforcement: Confirms the success and effectiveness of DGGI in using intelligence and data analytics for tax enforcement. Revenue Protection: Protects the national revenue stream from large-scale fraudulent diversions. Fair Market: Restores a level playing field by penalizing businesses that distort prices through tax evasion. Deterrence: Arrests and seizures act as a strong deterrent against future attempts at tax fraud.
NegativesComplexity of Law: Complex GST rules can inadvertently create loopholes that sophisticated fraudsters exploit. Ease of Doing Business: Excessive vigilance and intrusive checks to curb fraud can sometimes inconvenience genuine, small taxpayers. Data Security: The need for extensive data sharing across departments raises concerns about data privacy and security.
Government SchemesE-Invoicing and E-Way Bill System: Digital mechanisms used to track and trace goods movement and transactions, curbing tax evasion. AI/ML-based Risk Profiling: Technology used by GST Network (GSTN) to flag high-risk taxpayers for investigation.

Way Forward

  1. Mandatory GSTR-2B Compliance: Make the reconciliation of ITC based on the automatically generated GSTR-2B mandatory for all taxpayers, tightening the claim process.
  2. Harmonizing Data: Enhance the seamless, real-time data sharing mechanism between the GST Network (GSTN), Income Tax Department (ITD), and Customs to create a 360-degree profile of high-risk entities.
  3. Simplified Compliance: Simplify tax forms and compliance requirements for small and medium-sized enterprises to reduce the unintentional errors that fraudsters often use as cover.
  4. Fast-Track Prosecution: Establish dedicated GST Tribunals and fast-track courts to ensure quick prosecution and sentencing of key operators, strengthening the punitive effect of the law.

Conclusion

The successful unearthing of the ₹645 crore ITC racket is a testament to the strengthening of India’s tax enforcement machinery, particularly through the use of technology. While the sheer scale of the fraud indicates that sophisticated networks remain a major threat to the GST system, sustained, intelligence-led action is the key to maintaining the integrity of the tax chain. Future success lies in combining technological vigilance with legal simplification and swift judicial deterrence, ensuring that the GST regime can fulfill its promise of ‘One Nation, One Tax, One Market.’


4. DRAFT Seeds Bill, 2025 – Reforming India’s Seed Regulation

Syllabus

GS-III: Agriculture: Major crops-cropping patterns in various parts of the country, different types of irrigation and irrigation systems storage, transport and marketing of agricultural produce and issues and related constraints; e-technology in the aid of farmers.

Context

The Ministry of Agriculture & Farmers Welfare inviting public comments on the Draft Seeds Bill, 2025, signals the government’s intent to replace the archaic Seeds Act, 1966. This reform is critical for modernizing India’s agricultural backbone, which depends heavily on the quality, accessibility, and genetic integrity of seeds. The Draft Bill aims to address challenges posed by climate change, new breeding technologies (including GM crops), and the protection of Farmers’ Rights against large seed corporations, necessitating a balance between stimulating private R&D and securing the welfare of small and marginal farmers.

Main Body in Multi-Dimensional Analysis

1. Technology and Intellectual Property Dimension

The new Bill seeks to streamline the process for registering seed varieties, promoting the adoption of high-yielding, climate-resilient seeds. It is expected to provide clearer regulations for Genetically Modified (GM) crops and products developed using new genomic techniques, potentially boosting private sector investment in agricultural biotechnology R&D. However, the regulatory framework must ensure that seed registration does not become an onerous, time-consuming process that hinders innovation. It must harmonize with the Protection of Plant Varieties and Farmers’ Rights (PPV&FR) Act, 2001, ensuring seed companies respect the intellectual property rights of farmers over their own traditional varieties.

2. Farmers’ Rights and Welfare Dimension

A crucial test for the Draft Bill is its treatment of farmers. The PPV&FR Act, 2001, grants farmers the right to save, use, sow, re-sow, exchange, share, or sell their farm produce, including seed of a protected variety, provided they do not sell it commercially under the brand name of the registered variety. The Draft Bill must not dilute these existing rights. Furthermore, it should contain strong provisions for compensation to farmers in case of seed failure (low yield or quality issues), establishing a robust mechanism for dispute resolution and liability, which is often neglected in the current system.

3. Quality Control and Market Dimension

The primary function of any Seeds Bill is to ensure the supply of high-quality, truthful-labeled seeds. The Draft Bill proposes stricter norms for compulsory registration of seed varieties and heavy penalties for the sale of spurious or mislabeled seeds. It introduces the concept of seed traceability using digital platforms, which is essential for quickly identifying the source of contamination or quality failure. This strengthening of the regulatory mechanism protects farmers from financial losses and builds consumer trust in the agricultural market, reducing the presence of illegal or unauthorized seeds.


Positives, Negatives, and Government Schemes

CategoryDescription
PositivesModernization: Replaces outdated 1966 Act, addressing modern challenges like climate change and GM crops. Quality Assurance: Stricter penal provisions and compulsory registration for better seed quality control. R&D Boost: Clearer regulatory pathway expected to incentivize private sector investment in seed research. Traceability: Potential for using digital technology for seed monitoring and accountability.
NegativesDilution of Rights: Risk of weakening the PPV&FR Act, 2001 provisions protecting farmers’ traditional rights over seed saving. Small Farmer Burden: Compliance costs for new registration norms could disproportionately affect small-scale seed producers and co-operatives. GM Regulation Ambiguity: The regulatory clarity for advanced breeding technologies remains a contentious point.
Government SchemesPradhan Mantri Fasal Bima Yojana (PMFBY): Provides risk coverage to farmers, including coverage for yield loss due to poor quality inputs (like seeds). National Seed Mission: Aimed at increasing the seed replacement rate (SRR) and providing quality seeds.

Way Forward

  1. Non-dilution of PPV&FR: Explicitly incorporate a clause within the Bill that mandates its provisions to be consistent with and not override the fundamental rights granted to farmers under the PPV&FR Act, 2001.
  2. Dispute Resolution Mechanism: Establish a dedicated Seed Grievance Authority at the district level for the swift and cost-effective resolution of compensation claims related to seed failure.
  3. Tiered Regulation: Implement a tiered regulatory structure where quality checks are stringent for mass-produced commercial seeds but simplified for traditional and farm-saved varieties to protect biodiversity.
  4. Climate-Resilient Focus: Mandate that the registration process gives priority and fast-track approval to seed varieties demonstrating superior climate-resilience (e.g., drought, heat, flood tolerance).

Conclusion

The Draft Seeds Bill, 2025, is a necessary legislative update for India’s agricultural sector, promising better quality control and a conducive environment for technological innovation. For the Bill to be truly transformative, it must successfully navigate the complex trade-off between commercial liberalization and farmer welfare. By preserving the core rights of farmers while enforcing strict quality standards and technological adoption, the final Bill can secure the foundation for India’s food security and make its agriculture sector resilient to future challenges.


5. PLI Scheme for White Goods Attracts ₹1,914 Crore Investment

Syllabus

GS-III: Indian Economy, issues relating to industrial growth. Infrastructure: Investment models.

Context

The announcement by the Ministry of Commerce & Industry that the 4th Round of the Production Linked Incentive (PLI) Scheme for White Goods (ACs and LED Lights) has attracted 13 new applications with a committed investment of ₹1,914 crore is a strong indicator of the scheme’s success. Notably, over 50% of these new applicants are MSMEs, demonstrating the scheme’s ability to boost the confidence of small and medium enterprises in joining the manufacturing value chain. The PLI scheme is the government’s flagship initiative to achieve ‘Aatmanirbhar Bharat’ by scaling up domestic production and achieving global competitiveness.

Main Body in Multi-Dimensional Analysis

1. Manufacturing and Value Chain Dimension

The investment is strategically focused on manufacturing high-value components for Air Conditioners (ACs) and LED Lights, such as copper tubes, compressors, and LED chips, rather than just assembly. This signals a deepening of the domestic value addition in the sector, which the scheme aims to increase from the current 15–20% to 75–80%. The PLI acts as a catalyst, encouraging companies to integrate backward by setting up component manufacturing, reducing reliance on imports (particularly from Southeast Asia), and strengthening the resilience of India’s manufacturing ecosystem.

2. MSME Empowerment and Economic Dimension

The high participation rate of MSMEs in the 4th round is the key positive takeaway. The PLI scheme, by offering production-linked incentives, de-risks capital-intensive component manufacturing for smaller players. This not only formalizes the MSME sector but also integrates it into global supply chains. The total committed investment of ₹1,914 crore, spread across six states and 23 locations, promises significant regional industrial growth and direct job creation (estimated at around 60,000 direct jobs from the scheme overall), contributing to inclusive economic development.

3. Global Competitiveness and Trade Dimension

The primary goal of the PLI scheme is to transform India from a net importer to a key global manufacturing hub for white goods. The incentives are structured to compensate for India’s competitive disadvantages, such as high logistics costs and the lack of economies of scale. By encouraging large-scale, high-volume production, Indian manufacturers can achieve cost-competitiveness that allows them to penetrate international markets, boosting exports and attracting Foreign Direct Investment (FDI) into the sector.


Positives, Negatives, and Government Schemes

CategoryDescription
PositivesBackward Integration: Focuses investment on high-value components, deepening the domestic manufacturing base. MSME Inclusion: Successfully attracts high participation from MSMEs, promoting grassroots industrialization. Employment Generation: Significant projected job creation in diverse regions across the country. Import Substitution: Directly reduces reliance on imported components, strengthening economic security.
NegativesSunset Clause: The time-bound nature of the incentive may not guarantee sustained investment after the scheme ends. Crowding Out: Risk of ‘crowding out’ smaller, non-PLI-approved domestic companies that cannot compete with subsidized PLI beneficiaries. Implementation Speed: Ensuring the swift disbursement of incentives and necessary infrastructural support remains a logistical challenge.
Government SchemesNational Programme on Advanced Chemistry Cell (ACC) Battery Storage: Complementary scheme for the EV sector. FAME-II Scheme: Promotes EV adoption, creating demand for efficient components. Make in India: Overarching government initiative to boost domestic manufacturing.

Way Forward

  1. Streamlined Disbursement: Establish a highly efficient, transparent, and digitized incentive disbursement mechanism to ensure timely payments to all approved beneficiaries, especially MSMEs.
  2. Skill Development Linkage: Mandate that PLI beneficiaries collaborate with local ITIs and polytechnics to develop specialized skill sets (e.g., HVAC technicians, LED chip assembly) tailored to the required component manufacturing.
  3. Monitoring Export Outcomes: Introduce specific Key Performance Indicators (KPIs) focused on export volumes and international market share achieved by PLI beneficiaries to ensure the scheme is not just about import substitution but global competitiveness.
  4. Plug-and-Play Infrastructure: Facilitate the creation of pre-approved Industrial Cluster Parks with common testing facilities to reduce the initial setup time and cost for new MSME applicants.

Conclusion

The strong investment momentum under the PLI Scheme for White Goods confirms its effectiveness as a policy tool for industrial transformation. The high participation of MSMEs suggests a successful transition toward inclusive, decentralized manufacturing. To fully realize the vision of a global manufacturing hub, the government must now focus on seamless execution, ensuring sustained technological upgradation and robust export orientation, thereby making Indian-made ACs and LEDs globally competitive long after the incentive window closes.


6. Transplantation of Human Organs and Tissues (Amendment) Rules, 2025

Syllabus

GS-II: Government Policies and Interventions. Issues relating to development and management of Social Sector/Services relating to Health.

Context

The Union Ministry of Health and Family Welfare’s notification of the Transplantation of Human Organs and Tissues (Amendment) Rules, 2025, marks a crucial step in reforming India’s organ donation and transplantation ecosystem. These amendments, based on expert committee recommendations, primarily focus on streamlining the process, preventing commercial exploitation, and addressing the vast gap between the demand and supply of organs. The reform is necessary to improve the transparency and accessibility of life-saving transplants while rigorously upholding the ethical and legal provisions of the Transplantation of Human Organs and Tissues Act (THOTA), 1994.

Main Body in Multi-Dimensional Analysis

1. Ethical and Legal Dimension

The amendments are aimed at strictly enforcing the ban on commercial trading of organs, which is a grave ethical and legal offense. Stricter scrutiny is mandated for non-relative transplants, where living donors are involved, to verify the motive and relationship between the donor and recipient, thereby curbing illegal transplant rackets. Furthermore, the amendments may introduce standardized protocols for brain death certification and retrieval procedures, ensuring that the process is transparent, legally sound, and minimizes the scope for exploitation or malpractices across all authorized hospitals.

2. Accessibility and Systemic Dimension

A key focus of the reforms is to remove administrative hurdles that impede legitimate transplants. This includes simplifying the process for obtaining a ‘No Objection Certificate’ (NOC) for the transplant of a deceased donor’s organs between states. The amendment seeks to ensure that geographical boundaries do not become a death sentence for patients waiting for matching organs. Establishing a robust, real-time, National Organ and Tissue Transplant Organisation (NOTTO) digital network with mandatory registration for all waitlisted patients and available organs is critical for equitable allocation.

3. Social and Behavioral Dimension

Despite a large population, India’s organ donation rate remains abysmal (around 0.8 donors per million population). The amendments are often accompanied by policy thrusts to encourage public awareness and cultural acceptance of both deceased and living donation. Introducing mandatory training on counselling for bereaved families in all hospitals is a soft intervention with a huge impact. The rules must also address the complexities of transplant tourism, ensuring that India’s health infrastructure is not misused by foreign nationals seeking transplants outside of stringent ethical frameworks.


Positives, Negatives, and Government Schemes

CategoryDescription
PositivesCurbing Organ Trafficking: Stricter verification rules for non-relative transplants enhance ethical safeguards. Inter-State Coordination: Streamlines the NOC process, improving the efficiency of organ sharing across states. Transparency: Enhances data integrity and allocation fairness through mandatory NOTTO registration. Public Health: Potentially increases the supply of organs, saving thousands of lives annually.
NegativesBureaucratic Delay: Overly complex verification processes, while necessary, can lead to critical delays in genuine cases. Digital Divide: The efficacy of a national digital registry depends on uniform digital capacity across all states and hospitals. Social Stigma: Legal amendments cannot independently overcome the deep-rooted cultural and religious hesitancy surrounding deceased organ donation.
Government SchemesNational Organ Transplant Programme (NOTP): Provides funding for state-level transplant infrastructure and awareness campaigns. Ayushman Bharat Digital Mission (ABDM): Provides the digital backbone for a potential national health registry, including organ donation data.

Way Forward

  1. Deemed Consent for Deceased Donation: Initiate a public debate on adopting a system of ‘opt-out’ or ‘deemed consent’ for deceased organ donation, provided public awareness is high, to address the critical supply shortage.
  2. Centralized Processing: Centralize the approval process for non-relative transplants at the NOTTO level to ensure uniform application of ethical and legal checks.
  3. Mandatory Training: Make mandatory training on medico-legal and ethical aspects of organ donation for all medical and para-medical staff in hospitals with Intensive Care Units (ICUs).
  4. Financial Support for Poor: Provide comprehensive financial support under schemes like Ayushman Bharat for transplant costs, ensuring that increased organ availability benefits the poor and marginalized.

Conclusion

The Transplantation of Human Organs and Tissues (Amendment) Rules, 2025, represent a vital, governance-led push to fortify the ethical framework and administrative efficiency of India’s transplant system. The focus on tightening security against illegal trade and improving inter-state coordination is commendable. However, the lasting success of this reform will require a national, concerted effort to fundamentally shift public behavior and bridge the resource disparity between states, thereby building a compassionate and transparent organ donation culture.


7. DRISHTI System: AI-Based Locking Monitoring for Freight Wagons

Syllabus

GS-III: Science and Technology: developments and their applications and effects in everyday life. Infrastructure: Railways.

Context

The Indian Railways’ plan to install DRISHTI (AI-Based Freight Wagon Locking Monitoring System) is a prime example of leveraging cutting-edge technology for operational safety and security. Developed in collaboration with the Northeast Frontier Railway (NFR) and IIT Guwahati Technology Innovation and Development Foundation (IITG TIDF), this system aims to solve the persistent operational challenge of unlocked or tampered doors on moving freight wagons. DRISHTI is poised to enhance freight security, reduce theft, and minimize the dependency on manual inspection, which is logistically intensive and prone to human error across India’s vast rail network.

Main Body in Multi-Dimensional Analysis

1. Technology and Operational Dimension

DRISHTI utilizes a combination of AI-powered cameras, sensors, and machine learning algorithms installed along the railway tracks. As a freight train passes, the system captures high-resolution images and video, immediately detecting anomalies such as an unlatched door, a broken seal, or evidence of tampering on the moving wagons. This real-time detection replaces the traditional manual inspection at yards, which is often inefficient and prone to long delays. The system generates instant alerts, allowing maintenance or security personnel to intervene immediately, vastly improving operational efficiency and reducing turn-around time.

2. Security and Economic Dimension

The inability to monitor wagon door integrity on the move leads to significant economic losses due to theft, pilferage, and damage to cargo (especially sensitive materials like cement, food grains, or manufactured goods). By providing a high level of security and traceability, DRISHTI helps maintain the integrity of the logistics chain, which is crucial for high-value cargo. This increase in reliability and safety makes the Indian Railways a more attractive and preferred mode of freight transport, thereby increasing freight revenue and contributing to the national logistics efficiency goal, which is vital for the National Logistics Policy.

3. Indigenous Innovation and Collaboration Dimension

The development of DRISHTI through the collaboration between the Indian Railways (NFR) and IITG TIDF exemplifies the ‘Innovate in India’ spirit under the Aatmanirbhar Bharat initiative. It showcases the successful application of domestic AI and engineering capabilities to solve a complex, real-world infrastructural problem. Such partnerships between national institutions (Railways) and academic/innovation hubs (IITs) are vital for the indigenization of technology and scaling up innovative solutions tailored to India’s unique operational environment.


Positives, Negatives, and Government Schemes

CategoryDescription
PositivesReal-Time Security: Detects tampering on moving wagons, enabling immediate action. Reduced Manual Error: Minimizes reliance on manual inspection, increasing consistency and safety. Theft Reduction: Leads to lower economic losses and improved cargo insurance viability. Indigenous Tech: A product of collaborative R&D between Indian Railways and IITG TIDF.
NegativesCapital Investment: Requires significant upfront investment in hardware (cameras, sensors) and AI processing units across the network. Maintenance: Need for continuous high-level maintenance and calibration of sensitive electronic equipment exposed to harsh railway environments. Data Handling: Requires a robust, high-speed data transmission and storage backbone to handle the continuous flow of high-resolution images/videos.
Government SchemesNational Rail Plan: Aims for modernized, safe, and efficient rail infrastructure. Gati Shakti Master Plan: Seeks integrated planning and implementation of infrastructure projects, including advanced logistics.

Way Forward

  1. Phased Rollout: Implement a phased rollout plan, initially prioritizing high-security and high-theft freight corridors before pan-India expansion.
  2. Standard Operating Procedure (SOP): Develop a clear SOP for immediate response teams to act upon DRISHTI alerts, ensuring the technology translates into effective field action.
  3. Cross-Validation: Integrate DRISHTI data with the existing Freight Operations Information System (FOIS) for cross-validation and predictive maintenance insights.
  4. Training and Skilling: Launch a dedicated training programme for railway security and maintenance staff on the operation, maintenance, and basic troubleshooting of the AI-based system.

Conclusion

The DRISHTI system is a transformative application of AI in railway operations, promising a leap forward in the security and efficiency of India’s freight transport. By leveraging indigenous innovation, the Railways can not only protect valuable cargo but also contribute significantly to the country’s overall logistics efficiency and economic growth. The success of this initial deployment will set a crucial precedent for the wider adoption of smart infrastructure in other critical sectors.


8. Inter-State Rivalry Fuelling India’s Growth (Competitive Federalism)

Syllabus

GS-II: Functions and responsibilities of the Union and the States, issues and challenges pertaining to the federal structure. Role of States in Economic Development.

Context

The editorial analysis in The Hindu or Indian Express on November 13, 2025, concerning the “Inter-State Rivalry That is Fuelling India’s Growth” highlights the emergence of Competitive Federalism. This trend signifies a shift from the era of central patronage, where states were largely dependent on New Delhi for economic direction, to a system where states actively compete with each other (and sometimes the Centre) to attract domestic and foreign investment. The competition is visible in areas like offering the most efficient policy frameworks, competitive incentives, and improved governance, thereby signaling a new era of state-level economic influence.

Main Body in Multi-Dimensional Analysis

1. Economic and Investment Dimension

Competitive federalism encourages states to become proactive economic agents. The rivalry, demonstrated by states securing marquee investments (e.g., in the semiconductor, EV, or data center sectors), forces them to improve their ‘Ease of Doing Business’ rankings, streamline bureaucratic processes, and enhance infrastructure (roads, power, water). This race to the top is beneficial for the national economy, as it results in increased overall investment, faster project implementation, and higher GDP growth rates for the competing states, thereby contributing to national growth.

2. Governance and Administrative Dimension

The competition extends beyond mere financial incentives to the quality of governance. States are compelled to invest in digitalization of land records, faster single-window clearances, labor law flexibility, and reliable public services. This internal pressure for administrative reform is arguably more effective than external mandates, leading to greater accountability and efficiency within state bureaucracies. It allows for policy experimentation, where successful models (e.g., in waste management or skill development) in one state can be quickly adopted by others.

3. Political and Social Dimension (Risks)

While economically beneficial, competitive federalism harbors political risks. The competition can transform into a ‘subsidy race’ or a ‘race to the bottom,’ where states offer overly generous financial incentives, tax holidays, or regulatory relaxations that become fiscally unsustainable or compromise environmental/labor standards. Furthermore, the focus on attracting capital-intensive industries can lead to regional imbalances and exacerbate intra-state disparities, particularly if resources are diverted from backward regions to already developed industrial corridors favored by investors.


Positives, Negatives, and Government Schemes

CategoryDescription
PositivesPolicy Experimentation: Allows states to innovate and test new governance and economic models (e.g., land pooling). Improved Governance: Forces states to improve ease of doing business, leading to faster clearances and better service delivery. Increased Investment: The overall competition translates into higher domestic and foreign investment across the country. Economic Decentralization: Shifts economic power and decision-making closer to the ground level.
NegativesSubsidy Race: States may engage in fiscally unsustainable competition by offering excessive incentives. Regulatory Race to the Bottom: Pressure to dilute labor and environmental standards to attract investors. Regional Imbalances: Widens the gap between well-governed, developed states and fiscally weak states, increasing inequality.
Government SchemesNITI Aayog’s Ranking Indices: Publication of rankings (e.g., Health Index, Innovation Index) drives competitive spirit among states. Gati Shakti Master Plan: Provides a framework for integrated infrastructure planning, which states compete to implement efficiently. National Urban Conclave: Platform for states to showcase best practices in urban governance and project execution.

Way Forward

  1. Setting a Floor: The Centre should establish a minimum floor for labor and environmental standards across all states, preventing a ‘race to the bottom’ through lax regulations.
  2. Fiscal Discipline Mechanism: Introduce mechanisms within the Fifteenth Finance Commission framework to reward states for good governance and fiscal prudence, not just for attracting investments at high cost.
  3. Co-operative Federalism Emphasis: The Centre must act as an “enabler” and “equalizer,” providing technical and financial support to fiscally weak states to bring them up to a competitive starting line.
  4. Data Transparency: Encourage transparent publication of all investment agreements and incentives offered by states to allow for public scrutiny and prevent unethical deals.

Conclusion

Competitive Federalism is a powerful, decentralized engine for India’s economic acceleration, driving efficiency and innovation in state governance. The rivalry, if managed wisely, is a net positive. However, the Centre must remain vigilant, acting as a steward to ensure that the competition remains healthy (beneficial to the public and the economy) and does not degenerate into a destructive subsidy war that undermines long-term fiscal stability or environmental protection. The future of India’s growth increasingly rests on the quality of this competitive, yet ultimately co-operative, federal partnership.

Comments

No comments yet. Why don’t you start the discussion?

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *