Dec 09 – PM IAS Editorial Analysis

Editorial 1: Democracy’s Paradox and the ECI’s Accountability (The Hindu/Indian Express)

  • Core Topic: The Supreme Court’s strong remarks on the Election Commission of India (ECI) regarding the lack of transparency and bureaucratic rigidity in the Special Intensive Revision (SIR) of electoral rolls and the alleged threats to Booth Level Officers (BLOs).
  • Syllabus Relevance: GS-II: Indian Constitution; Statutory, regulatory and various quasi-judicial bodies (ECI); Governance.

Analysis and Argument

  • The Democratic Paradox: The editorial highlights a core paradox: the integrity of India’s democracy rests on an accurate electoral roll, yet the process of maintaining this roll—the SIR—is fraught with bureaucratic insensitivity and, alarmingly, political intimidation.
  • ECI’s Defensive Posture: The court’s sharp criticism was aimed at the ECI’s submission of “mechanical and cyclostyled” affidavits that failed to address genuine voter grievances (e.g., issues with proof of citizenship/residency) and the safety concerns of BLOs. The editorial argues this posture indicates an institutional reluctance to descend from the pedestal of authority and engage with ground-level realities.
  • Constitutional Boundaries: A critical constitutional point raised is the ECI’s perceived overreach. While the ECI is mandated to prepare the electoral rolls, the law does not empower it to determine citizenship, which falls under the Union Home Ministry. The editorial warns against the ECI becoming an arbiter of citizenship, which could politicize a purely administrative exercise.
  • The Burden of Proof: The current process implicitly shifts the burden of proving citizenship or residence onto the individual voter, unsettling the long-standing democratic presumption that all residents are citizens unless proven otherwise. This procedural shift creates vulnerabilities for marginalized communities.

Way Forward (Editorial View)

  1. Structural Audit: The ECI must conduct an immediate, independent audit of the SIR process, focusing on transparency and grievance redressal mechanisms.
  2. Protecting Foot Soldiers: State governments must provide iron-clad security for BLOs, and the SC must monitor compliance, warning that political interference in electoral administration is a threat to the Republic’s foundational principles.
  3. Legal Clarity: The Legislature needs to clearly define the role and limits of the ECI concerning citizenship verification to avoid legal ambiguity.

Editorial 2: The Logic of a Resilient Partnership (The Hindu/Indian Express)

  • Core Topic: The outcomes of the recent India-Russia summit, focusing on the commitment to strengthen the long-standing strategic partnership amidst global geopolitical shifts (Ukraine war, Western sanctions).
  • Syllabus Relevance: GS-II: Bilateral, regional and global groupings and agreements involving India and/or affecting India’s interests.

Analysis and Argument

  • A Partnership of Necessity and History: The editorial terms the India-Russia relationship a “logic of its own,” rooted in decades of cooperation in defense, space, and nuclear energy. The summit’s success underscores India’s pragmatic, non-aligned foreign policy: maintaining ties with Moscow despite Western pressure.
  • Economic Strategy: The adoption of Programme 2030 to deepen economic ties is viewed as a critical strategy to diversify trade beyond defence. Focus areas like fertilizers, pharmaceuticals, and critical raw materials leverage Russia’s vast resources and India’s manufacturing needs. This helps India buffer itself against global supply chain disruptions.
  • Trade Settlement Mechanism: The continued emphasis on settling bilateral trade in national currencies (Rupees and Rubles) is hailed as a major step toward de-dollarization, protecting the trade volume from the volatility of Western sanctions.
  • Challenges of Modernization: While Russia remains a trusted source for legacy defense platforms, the editorial subtly points to the future challenge: India’s push for ‘Atmanirbhar Bharat’ requires greater technological transfer and co-development, not just off-the-shelf purchases, a point where Western partners often hesitate.

The Geopolitical Context

  • The editorial notes the summit’s subtle but firm rejection of a “G2” or any attempt to carve out exclusive spheres of influence, aligning with India and Russia’s shared vision of a “multipolar world.”
  • The agreement on manpower mobility is viewed as a pragmatic Russian response to its own demographic crisis and a strategic move to counter potential over-reliance on a Central Asian or Chinese workforce.

Way Forward (Editorial View)

  1. Investment Focus: India must actively boost Russian investment in non-energy sectors to create a more resilient, balanced trade basket.
  2. Connectivity: Rapidly operationalize the International North-South Transport Corridor (INSTC) to ensure smooth, sanctions-proof physical connectivity.
  3. Technology Transfer: Insist on guaranteed technology transfer for future defense deals to meet India’s indigenization goals.

Comments

No comments yet. Why don’t you start the discussion?

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *